ArticleFederal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS2024
Using Telehealth to Increase Lung Cancer Screening Referrals for At-Risk Veterans in Rural Communities.
Article in Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does a Patient-Centered Informational Video Impact Real-World Perception of Lung Cancer Screening Among At-Risk Veterans?: A Pilot Project in Rural America.CHEST pulmonary · 2025Article
- Association of Telehealth Encounters With Lung Cancer Screening Consultation in the U.S.: Preliminary Results.AJPM focus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: At-risk rural veterans have low rates of lung cancer screening (LCS). This proof-of-principle quality improvement project aimed to determine whether a telehealth intervention would increase referrals for at-risk veterans living in the rural upper Midwest and attending a smoking cessation program to LCS with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) of the chest. Methods: Sixty-eight of 74 LCS-eligible rural veterans who self-enrolled in a smoking cessation program were contacted by telephone. Those who agreed to enroll in LCS were referred to LDCT and followed for 4 months. At the conclusion of the intervention, the number of referrals and screenings performed were tabulated. LDCT reports were reviewed and scored according to Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) version 1.1. Results: Only 3 of 74 LCS-eligible veterans (4%) underwent LDCT before initiation of this telehealth intervention. By the conclusion of this 4-month project, 19 of 74 veterans (26%) underwent LDCT. Forty-one veterans were successfully contacted and 29 agreed to participate in LCS. Of those who agreed to participate, 19 underwent LDCT within 4 months. Of the veterans who received LDCT, 10 were diagnosed with Lung-RADS 1, 7 with Lung-RADS 2, 1 with Lung-RADS 3, and 1 with Lung-RADS 4B. Annual follow-up LDCT or referral for further evaluation were pursued in each case. Conclusions: Collectively, these data suggest that telehealth intervention could increase referrals of at-risk rural veterans to a centralized LCS program at a regional US Department of Veterans Affairs medical facility.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.