ArticleJournal of health monitoring2024
When do parents report their child's administrative ADHD diagnosis? A utilisation-based analysis from the consortium project INTEGRATE-ADHD.
Article in Journal of health monitoring, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- ADHD in Children, Adolescents, and Adults: Incidence, Prevalence, and Treatment. An Analysis of Routine Health Insurance Data.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2026Article
- Article
- Parental psychosocial factors associated with parental reporting of their child's administrative ADHD diagnosis - results from the consortium project INTEGRATE-ADHD.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Differences in frequency between administrative and parent-reported ADHD diagnosis data of children and adolescents taking sociodemographic characteristics into account - Results from the consortium project INTEGRATE-ADHD.Journal of health monitoring · 2024Article
- A societal challenge with high public health relevance: ADHD in children and adolescents in Germany.Journal of health monitoring · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This article examines discrepancies in the frequency of diagnoses of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents in Germany using information on health care utilisation from both administrative and parent-reported survey data linked at person level. Methods: 5,461 parents of 0- to 17-year-olds insured with DAK-Gesundheit in 2020 and being registered with a confirmed administrative ADHD diagnosis (ICD-10 F90.0-9) in at least one quarter in 2020 (M1Q criterion) were surveyed online on their child's ADHD diagnosis, utilisation of specialist care and therapeutic service providers. With regard to the presence of a parental report of the child's documented ADHD diagnosis, administrative data and survey data were bi- and multivariately analysed. Results: The response rate was 21.5 %. ADHD diagnoses were given more frequently in the context of paediatric care, but in the multivariable model with the administrative data only the diagnosis made by mental health professionals (OR = 2.78), in the model with the survey data only utilisation of mental health professionals (OR = 2.99) positively predicted the parental diagnostic report. With regard to the utilisation of therapeutic service providers, only the utilisation of occupational therapy was associated with the parental report of the diagnosis in both data sources. Conclusions: Parental non-reporting of a child's administrative ADHD diagnosis in survey studies can be in part be explained by utilisation characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.