Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39411291›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2024

Voices from the ICU: Perspectives on Humanization in Critical Care Settings.

Gunchan Paul, Rubina K Mahajan, Parshotam L Gautam, Gursabeen Kaur, Sidakbir S Paul, Birinder Paul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Care Beyond Cure: Humanizing the Intensive Care Unit Journey.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gunchan PaulDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3834-9852
Rubina K MahajanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9933-5342
Parshotam L GautamDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7615-4781
Gursabeen KaurDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2476-5685
Sidakbir S PaulDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5338-7943
Birinder PaulDepartment of Neurology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6039-4740

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the intensive care unit (ICU), relentless demands of immediate action, reliance on high-tech equipment, and weight of an overwhelming workload can obscure the patient's humanity. The impact of this dehumanization and humanization may be significant, hence the study aimed to understand experiences of ICU patients and their families and seek to understand the outcomes of such encounters during the course of ICU care. The study was based on inductive-grounded theory approach. After taking informed consent, the investigators invited the participants for the interview, in the vernacular language that was audio recorded and field notes were taken. Under the two main dimensions of humanization and dehumanization, the data yielded four main themes and eight sub-themes. The themes were communication, infrastructure, experience of care and patient autonomy. The dehumanizing behaviors contributed to patients feeling disregarded and undermined their sense of dignity and worth. To our understanding, this is the foremost barrier to a heathy patient-physician relationship. However, by prioritizing humanization in the ICU, healthcare professionals can create a more compassionate and supportive environment. Hence, it is essential to implement strategies that improve patient and family support in the ICU, such as providing regular updates on the patient's condition, offering emotional support through counseling services, and involving families in the care decision-making process. These measures can help alleviate the vulnerability experienced by patients and their families during such challenging times. How to cite this article: Paul G, Mahajan RK, Gautam PL, Kaur G, Paul SS, Paul B. Voices from the ICU: Perspectives on Humanization in Critical Care Settings. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(10):923-929.

Indexed as

CommunicationDehumanizationExperience of careFamiliesHumanizationInfrastructurePatient autonomy

Identifiers

PMID39411291
PMCPMC11471984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.