Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39411245›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2024

Understanding visual perception in visual snow syndrome: a battery of psychophysical tests plus the 30-day clinical diary.

Simona Garobbio, Reza Mazloum, Michael Rosio, Jeanette Popovova, Raphaela Schöpfer, Fabienne C Fierz, Leah R Disse, Konrad Peter Weber, Christoph J Schankin, Lars Michels and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Visual Snow Is Susceptible to the Motion Aftereffect.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Simona GarobbioLaboratory of Psychophysics, Brain Mind Institute, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8858-858X
Reza MazloumDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Michael RosioDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Jeanette PopovovaDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Raphaela SchöpferDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Fabienne C FierzDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Leah R DisseDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Konrad Peter WeberDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Christoph J SchankinDepartment of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4668-6098
Lars MichelsDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Michael H HerzogLaboratory of Psychophysics, Brain Mind Institute, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with visual snow syndrome (VSS) experience uncountable flickering tiny dots in the entire visual field. Symptoms often persist over the years. Very little is known about altered perception in VSS. VSS is diagnosed based on subjective reports because there is no manual with objective measures. In this study, 20 patients with VSS and 17 healthy controls performed a battery of tests assessing visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, illusion perception, spatial-temporal vision, motion perception, visual attention, and selective attention. Surprisingly, except for one test, which is the honeycomb illusion, patients performed at the same level as controls. Patients reporting black and white visual snow performed better in the Stroop test compared to patients reporting other visual snow colours. In addition to a clinical visit, the 30-day clinical diary was administered to patients to broadly measure their symptom severity. We found that better performance in the tests, in particular in the contrast and coherent motion tests, was correlated with lower VSS symptoms, weaker VS characteristics (e.g. density and size) and lower VS severity. Our results suggest that, even if visual abilities are not deteriorated by VSS, they can determine how severe symptoms are, and show that VSS is an heterogenous disorder where symptoms and visual abilities vary between patients, for instance depending on the VS colour. The study was primarily designed to identify tests where performance differs between controls and patients. In addition, exploratory analyses were conducted to initiate an understanding of the overall pattern of relationships between patients' visual abilities and symptoms, which is of clinical relevance. Future studies with more power are necessary to validate our findings.

Indexed as

30-day clinical diaryindividual differencesobjective diagnosispsychophysicsvisual snow syndrome

Identifiers

PMID39411245
PMCPMC11474241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.