ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2024
Sociodemographic Disparities in Hepatitis B Treatment: A Real-World Analysis of 3 Safety-Net Health Systems in the United States.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gaps and Disparities in the Hepatitis B Cascade of Care Among a National Cohort of US Veterans With Chronic Hepatitis B Infection.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Prevention of hepatitis B virus reactivation according to hepatitis B surface antigen status in patients receiving systemic chemotherapy in Japan using an electronic medical record database.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Hepatitis B Virus Treatment Gaps in the US.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Gaps and disparities in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection in the USA.Gastroenterology report · 2025Review
- No Differences in Risk of Cirrhosis or Hepatocellular Carcinoma Among Treatment Naïve Chronic Hepatitis B Patients by Baseline Hepatitis B Viral Load: A Propensity Score Weighted Analysis.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Timely treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) reduces risks of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Gaps in timely treatment persist, especially among underserved safety-net populations. We aim to evaluate gaps and disparities in CHB treatment in the United States. Methods: Adults with treatment-naive CHB without human immunodeficiency virus were identified from 2010 to 2018 across 3 safety-net health systems. CHB treatment eligibility was assessed using American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) criteria and alternative criteria, including the Simplified Approach for Hepatitis B Algorithm. Differences in CHB treatment between groups were evaluated using χ Results: Among 3749 patients with treatment-naive CHB (51.5% women, 38.7% White, 33.7% African American, 19.6% Asian, 24.6% cirrhosis), 30.0% were AASLD treatment eligible, among whom 31.0% were treated. Men were more likely than women to be treated (33.5% vs 26.6%, Conclusions: Among an ethnically diverse multicenter safety-net cohort of CHB patients, less than one-third of treatment-eligible patients received antiviral treatment. Significant disparities in CHB treatment were observed by sociodemographic characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.