ArticlePractical laboratory medicine2024
The potential relationship between EasyNAT system Tt values and Cobas z480 Ct values in the detection of SARS-Cov-2.
Article in Practical laboratory medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the potential relationship between the time threshold (Tt) values of a commercial EasyNAT system, which is based on cross priming amplification (CPA) technology, and the cycle threshold (Ct) values of the Cobas z480 analyzer, which is based on a real-time fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method, in the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) from oropharyngeal swabs. Design and Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from a clinical laboratory between December 4, 2022 and July 1, 2024. Results: A total of 277 EasyNAT-positive samples (Tt values from 3.83 to 29.5) were simultaneously investigated using the Cobas z480 analyzer (Ct values from 10.74 to 38.78). The concordance rate between the two systems was 100 %. Among the positive samples, the mean and maximum PCR Ct values of O and N genes increased in line with increasing Tt values of the left and right amplification areas of the EasyNAT system. The maximum Ct values of the O or N gene determined by the Cobas z480 analyzer were no more than 29.52 when the Tt values of the left or right amplification areas of the UC0116 analyzer were no more than 6. Conclusions: The safe, simple, fast, accurate, and automatic EasyNAT system used in conjunction with a PCR system might be a better choice for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in hospitals, especially in settings without sophisticated PCR facilities. The Tt value (≤6) of the EasyNAT system can be a reference index for estimating the maximum Ct value (29.52) in SARS-CoV-2-positive samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.