ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Assessment of ferroptosis as a promising candidate for metastatic uveal melanoma treatment and prognostication.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Ferrous-Supply-Regenerating Lipid Nanoparticle Integrating RNAi Induces Ferroptosis for Cancer Therapy.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Review
- Dihydroartemisinin Induces Ferroptosis in Uveal Melanoma Cells Through the HO-1 and xCT/GPX4 Signaling Pathways.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- The ratio of effect-based combination indexes can indicate nonapoptotic cell-death in a combined cancer therapy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- The Rho/MRTF-pirin axis: a promising target for overcoming melanoma drug resistance.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular tumour in adults. Local resection, radiation therapy, and enucleation are the current first-line, primary UM treatments. However, regardless of the treatment received, around 50% of UM patients will develop metastatic disease within five to 7 years. In the largest published series of unselected patients with metastatic UM (mUM), the median survival time after diagnosis of metastasis was 3.6 months, with less than 1% of patients surviving beyond 5 years. Approved drugs for treatment of mUM include systemic treatment with tebentafusp-tebn or isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) with melphalan. However, these drugs are only available to a subset of patients and improve survival by only a few months, highlighting the urgent need for new mUM treatments. Accurately predicting which patients are at high risk for metastases is also crucial. Researchers are developing gene expression signatures in primary UM to create reliable prognostic models aimed at improving patient follow-up and treatment strategies. In this review we discuss the evidence supporting ferroptosis, a non-apoptotic form of cell death, as a potential novel treatment target and prognosticator for UM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.