Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39411028›Full record

ArticleRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2024

[Rapid review: effectiveness of the

Alanis Amorim Angotti, João Gabriel Sanchez Tavares da Silva, Tatiana Yonekura, Mabel Fernandes Figueiró

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. [Rapid review: effectiveness of theRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alanis Amorim AngottiPesquisadora autônoma   Pesquisadora autônoma.
João Gabriel Sanchez Tavares da SilvaInstituto de Pesquisa HCor   Instituto de Pesquisa, HCor.
Tatiana YonekuraInstituto de Pesquisa HCor   Instituto de Pesquisa, HCor.
Mabel Fernandes FigueiróInstituto de Pesquisa HCor   Instituto de Pesquisa, HCor.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To identify and synthesize evidence of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Methodology: Rapid systematic review. A search of five online portals and bibliographic databases was conducted in February 2022. Two reviewers conducted the selection stages, with any disagreements resolved by a third investigator. Data were extracted by one reviewer and subsequently checked by another. The inclusion criteria were studies describing the cost-effectiveness and effectiveness of the Results: Four studies were included: one cluster randomized trial, two quasi-experimental studies, and one pre-post study, published between 2019 and 2021 in four countries. The included studies reported effectiveness for some of the outcomes of interest, such as a reduction in the incidence of dengue, Zika, and chikungunya cases. Although no experimental studies addressing the cost-effectiveness of the Conclusion: Considering the results of the included studies,

Indexed as

arbovirusesevidence-informed policyreviewWolbachia

Identifiers

PMID39411028
PMCPMC11476870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.