Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39411009›Full record

ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2024

Early placement of a non-invasive, pressure-regulated, fascial reapproximation device improves reduction of the fascial gap in open abdomens: a retrospective cohort study.

Asad Naveed, Niels D Martin, Mohammed Bawazeer, Atif Jastaniah, Joao B Rezende-Neto

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07154589 (Effects of AbClo Fascial Approximation Device in Patients With Open Abdomen on Respiratory Mechanics), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07154589 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effects of AbClo Fascial Approximation Device in Patients With Open Abdomen on Respiratory Mechanics (AbClo-Resp)

TypeobservationalSponsorUnity Health TorontoRan2025 to 2026Enrolled18ConditionsOpen Abdomen, Mechanical Ventilation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Do not fear the open abdomen.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Asad NaveedDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Niels D MartinSurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2157-0825
Mohammed BawazeerTufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Atif JastaniahDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Joao B Rezende-NetoDepartment of Surgery, Division of General Surgery St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8051-4639

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Since current fascial traction methods involve invasive procedures, they are generally employed late in the management of the open abdomen (OA). This study aimed to evaluate early versus late placement of a non-invasive, pressure-regulated device for fascial reapproximation and gap reduction in OA patients. Methods: The study included all patients who had the abdominal fascia intentionally left open after damage control operation for trauma and emergency general surgery and were managed with the device in an academic hospital between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2023. Time of device placement in relation to the end of index laparotomy was defined as early (≤24 hours) versus late (>24 hours). Time-related mid-incisional width reduction of the fascial gap and fascial closure were assessed using descriptive and linear regression analysis. Results: There was a significantly higher percent reduction in the fascial gap at the midpoint of the laparotomies in the early (≤24 hours) AbClo placement group compared with the late (>24 hours) AbClo placement group, respectively, median 76% versus 43%, p<0.001. Linear regression adjusting for body mass index and the number of takebacks indicated that fascial approximation was 22% higher for early placement (β=0.22; CI 0.12, 0.33, p<0.001). Primary myofascial closure rate with early (≤24 hours) application of the device was 98% versus 85% with late application. Conclusion: Early non-invasive application of the device (≤24 hours) after the initial laparotomy resulted in greater reduction of the fascial gap and higher primary fascial closure rate compared with late placement (>24 hours). Early non-invasive intervention could prevent abdominal wall myofascial retraction in OA patients. Level of evidence: IV.

Indexed as

AbdomenMultiple TraumaPeritonitisWound Closure Techniques

Identifiers

PMID39411009
PMCPMC11474681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.