Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39411001›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2024

Biomechanical comparison of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene sutures of different thicknesses of the tensile strength for pullout repair of medial meniscal posterior root tear.

Hibiki Kakiage, Mikiko Handa, Tsuneari Takahashi, Katsushi Takeshita, Hirotaka Chikuda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hibiki KakiageDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Gunma University Maebashi Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3026-2119
Mikiko HandaDepartment of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine Jichi Medical University Shimotsuke Japan.ORCID 0009-0007-2132-8928
Tsuneari TakahashiDepartment of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine Jichi Medical University Shimotsuke Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4198-6684
Katsushi TakeshitaDepartment of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine Jichi Medical University Shimotsuke Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8470-4555
Hirotaka ChikudaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Gunma University Maebashi Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7913-1542

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRT) are a risk factor for knee osteoarthritis. The predominant treatment for MMPRT is transtibial pullout repair, and loop suture remains the gold standard procedure. This study aimed to investigate the structural properties of the meniscus-suture-tibia (MST) complex after loop stitch using ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) suture tape of different thicknesses. Methods: This study used 20 fresh porcine MMPRT model knees. All specimens were randomised into two treatment groups: (1) pullout repair using 1.3 mm suture tape (thin group, Results: No significant differences were found between the thin and thick groups in terms of maximum load (108.8 ± 49.6 vs. 90.1 ± 33.6 N; Conclusion: The structural properties of the thickness of the different UHMWPE were comparable in MMPRT repair. Additionally, 1.3 mm PERMATAPE may demonstrate similar repair potential as 2.5 mm PERMATAPE. Level of Evidence: Level Ⅳ.

Indexed as

medial meniscus posterior root tearsporcine modelultra‐high molecular weight polyethylene

Identifiers

PMID39411001
PMCPMC11474232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.