ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
Intrafocal Pinning in Distal Extraarticular Radius Fracture: A Retrospective Study Based on Patient Age.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Percutaneous intrafocal pinning is one of the many surgical options for extraarticular distal radius fracture with minimal comminution. This study aims to describe the role and indications of intrafocal pinning. Methods: This monocentric, retrospective study included 49 patients who underwent intrafocal pinning for distal radius fractures in 2013 in our French hand surgery department. All the patients underwent posteroanterior and lateral x-ray on days 2 and 45 to measure radial inclination, distal radioulnar index, and volar tilt. Results: The mean age of the patients was 45.4 years, with women representing approximately 61.2% of the sample (n = 30). The patients were divided into three groups: group A (17-50 y), 26 patients; group B (50-70 y), 15 patients; and group C (>70 y), eight patients. We documented on x-ray images, 21 secondary displacements, including seven in group C. There were three displacements (all in group C) and one surgical revision within 15 days for a previous displacement. The distal radioulnar index increased in all three groups. Conclusions: The percutaneous intrafocal pinning fixation technique exposes a high risk of complications, especially for those older than 50 years, for whom this technique should be avoided. Overall, due to the frequency of secondary displacements encountered, our first-line treatment favors plate osteosynthesis for all patients. Pinning fixation should only be considered with caution in younger patients if plate osteosynthesis is not possible, but it requires a strict 6-week immobilization. The fracture morphology must also be considered.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.