ArticleInternet interventions2024
Evaluation of the impact of a digital care navigator on increasing patient registration with digital mental health interventions in routine care.
Article in Internet interventions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- From research to real-life implementation: an evaluation of the scale up of a guided digital mental health intervention in Lebanon: Step-by-Step.Frontiers in public health · 2025Trial
- Opportunities for Digital Health to Support Early Psychosis Care in Ghana: Qualitative Study Among Patients, Caregivers, and Clinicians.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- A scoping review of the characteristics, responsibilities, implementations and evaluations of digital navigators in healthcare.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Expanding Telehealth Use for Older Adults Across the Cancer Control Continuum: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR cancer · 2026Article
- Moving beyond global scores: the added value of clinical dimensions for assessing HRQoL in mental disorders.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Integrating digital therapeutics for patients with mental illness into clinical practice: perspectives for US healthcare professionals.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Characteristics Associated With the Use of the Mindfulness Meditation App Headspace in a Large Public Health Deployment: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Strategies to Optimize Recovery in Frail Patients With Cardiovascular Disease Through Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation.Journal of lipid and atherosclerosis · 2025Review
- Digital mental health treatment implementation playbook: successful practices from implementation experiences in American healthcare organizations.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Implementation and Clinical Effectiveness of an Innovative Digital First Care Model for Behavioral Health Using the RE-AIM Framework: Quantitative Evaluation.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Less than half of adults with mental health disorders in the United States receive appropriate or timely care. Digital Mental Health Interventions (DMHIs) have the potential to bridge this gap. However, real-world adoption of DMHIs is impeded by patient and provider-level technological barriers. Care navigators have the potential to address these challenges by providing technical support and enhancing patients' experience with DMHIs. Objective: This study explores the effect of a digital care navigator (DCN) on patient registration latency and rates of DMHIs implemented as part of a digital-first behavioral health care model integrated within routine care at a large multispecialty group medical practice. Methods: Data were collected from electronic medical records and DMHI registration data were obtained from the DMHI vendors. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the DCN's efforts to help patients register with their DMHIs. Moods median tests evaluated differences in registration latency and weekly registration rate pre- and post- DCN implementation. Change in registration likelihood as a function of DCN outreach latency was investigated using a Kaplan-Meier plot. Results: During the first eight months, the DCN made 1306 phone calls to 680 unique patients, successfully connecting with 66 %. DCN implementation also increased the median registration rate from 61.9 % to 76.9 %. Results showed that the expediency by which the DCN outreached patients directly impacted registration rate such that of those who were outreached by the DCN on the day of their referral to a DMHI, 96.86 % registered. This number was reduced to 76.15 % if the DCN reached them 1-day following referral, and 41.39 % 5-days after their referral. Conclusions: Use of a DCN shows promise for enhancing patient registration rates with DMHIs in routine healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.