Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39410807›Full record

ArticleJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2025

The impact of an enteral formula with food-derived ingredients on dietetic practice at a specialist children's hospital in the UK: Retrospective study.

Graeme O'Connor, Angela Camacho Velandia, Zoltan Hartfiel Capriles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The impact of an enteral formula with food-derived ingredients on dietetic practice at a specialist children's hospital in the UK: Retrospective study.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Graeme O'ConnorDepartment of Dietetics, Great Ormond Street Hospital Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8625-9264
Angela Camacho VelandiaDepartment of Dietetics, Great Ormond Street Hospital Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Zoltan Hartfiel CaprilesDepartment of Biometry Statistics, Sofpromed Clinical Investigation, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.

Funding

Nestlé Health Science
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlended tube feeds are reported to be better tolerated in some children compared to standard commercial enteral formulas, allowing children to normalise feeding by having similar foods as the rest of the family. However, a blended tube feed is contraindicated in patients who are immunocompromised or require post-pyloric feeding as a result of a food safety risk. Other contraindications for blended diet include children who require continuous pump feeding via gastrostomy or nasogastric feeding tube (< 12 Fr) and fluid restrictions. To meet the demands of consumers, manufacturers have developed enteral formulas with food-derived ingredients (EFI). Commercially available EFIs are relatively novel in the UK. The present study aimed to monitor the implementation of an EFI by dietitians in a specialist children's hospital.

methodsA single-centre retrospective study was conducted to monitor the dietetic practice of commencing a commercially available EFI (Compleat® paediatric; Nestlé Health Science; 1.2 kcal/ml with 14% food-derived ingredients). Using electronic medical notes, data were collected on all children who commenced an EFI via an enteral feeding tube in a specialist paediatric hospital between August 2022 and December 2023. Data were gathered on demographics (age, sex and primary diagnosis), anthropometric measurements (weight-for-age Z-score and height-for-age Z-score), feed regimens (feed volume, feeding route, mode of feeding [continuous, bolus]), gastrointestinal symptoms (gastro-oesophageal reflux, vomiting, abdominal discomfort, constipation and loose stools) and geographical discharge area for children on home enteral nutrition.

resultsSeventy children were included in the analysis. The mean ± SD age was 4.7 ± 6 years. The median admission weight-for-age Z-score was -1.50. The most common primary diagnosis was a neurological impairment in 37/70 (47%) children. Most children were fed via a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy 31/70 (44%) and 8/70 (11%) of the children fed directly into the jejunum. The most common reason being gastrointestinal symptoms, 58/70 (83%). The most common gastrointestinal symptom reported before commencing an EFI was loose stools in 22/58 (38%) children. Within 7 days of commencing an EFI, there was reported improvement in gastrointestinal symptoms in all categories. In total, 42/70 children were discharged on an EFI.

conclusionsIn our specialist children's hospital, EFI is primarily implemented by dietitians in children who are already established on an enteral formula displaying gastrointestinal symptoms. However, dietitians are increasingly implementing an EFI as their first-line whole protein enteral formula. Furthermore, an EFI was also implemented as a compromise to a blended diet.

Indexed as

DieteticsEnteral NutritionFood, FormulatedHospitals, PediatricChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleRetrospective StudiesUnited Kingdomacute settingblended dietchildrenenteral nutritionfood‐based enteral formulafood derived ingredientsgastrointestinal symptoms

Identifiers

PMID39410807
PMCPMC11589405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.