ReviewClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2025
The Potential of Disease Progression Modeling to Advance Clinical Development and Decision Making.
Review in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Empowering Clinical Development With Disease Progression Modeling: Recommendations From the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- State-transition and simulation-based modeling approaches for simulating the progression of dental caries: a scoping review.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While some model-informed drug development frameworks are well recognized as enabling clinical trials, the value of disease progression modeling (DPM) in impacting medical product development has yet to be fully realized. The Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative assembled a diverse project team from across the patient, academic, regulatory, and industry sectors of practice to advance the use of DPM for decision making in clinical trials and medical product development. This team conducted a scoping review to explore current applications of DPM and convened a multi-stakeholder expert meeting to discuss its value in medical product development. In this article, we present the scoping review and expert meeting output and propose key questions that medical product developers and regulators may use to inform clinical development strategy, appreciate the therapeutic context and endpoint selection, and optimize trial design with disease progression models. By expanding awareness of the unique value of DPM, this article does not aim to be technical in nature but rather aims to highlight the potential of DPM to improve the quality and efficiency of medical product development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.