SynthesisMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2024
Sex and Population Variations in Nasopalatine Canal Dimensions: A CBCT-Based Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Retrospective Evaluation of Nasopalatine Canal Anatomy, Dimensions, and Variations with Alveolar Bone in Patients Scheduled for Maxillary Anterior Dental Implant Surgery Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Article
- CBCT Evaluation of Maxillary Incisive Canal Characteristics Among Population in Regard to Possibility of Implant Cortical Anchorage-A Multicenter Study.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Morphology and dimensions of the nasopalatine canal in Palestinian patients assessed using cone beam computed tomography.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparison of incisive canal remodeling and root resorption in extraction vs. non-extraction fixed orthodontic retraction: a CBCT study.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The nasopalatine canal (NPC), an interosseous conduit in the anterior maxilla, plays a crucial role in various dental procedures, such as implant placement, orthodontics, and surgical interventions. Accurate anatomical characterization of the NPC is essential to avoid complications, as its morphometric variations can impact the nasopalatine nerve and vascular structures within the canal. Traditional radiography techniques are limited in displaying the canal's detailed anatomy due to issues like magnification and distortion. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), with its superior imaging quality and reduced radiation exposure, has become the preferred method for NPC evaluation. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the published literature on the variations in anatomy and dimensions of the NPC using CBCT. A complete literature search was conducted in Web of Science, PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and ProQuest electronic databases. The following keywords were used alone or combined: CBCT, measurements [(nasopalatine canal length), (incisive foramen), (foramina of Stenson), (buccal bone plate), gender, plane as (oblique measurements), or (sagittal or axial). Papers were manually searched utilizing their reference titles. Research selection was restricted to the time of publication but not to the type of tested publication from different countries or sex and NPC parameter measurements. Fourteen full-length papers were included. Parameters like NPC length and diameters of incisive foramen (IF) and foramina of Stenson (FS) were generally higher in males than females, with significant differences noted across most studies. NPC dimensions are influenced by sex, with males typically exhibiting larger measurements. Additionally, NPC dimensions vary among different populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.