Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39410648›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

A Comparative Study of Metaheuristic Feature Selection Algorithms for Respiratory Disease Classification.

Damla Gürkan Kuntalp, Nermin Özcan, Okan Düzyel, Fevzi Yasin Kababulut, Mehmet Kuntalp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Damla Gürkan KuntalpDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir 35160, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-0617-7918
Nermin ÖzcanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, İskenderun Technical University, İskenderun 31200, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-5327-9090
Okan DüzyelDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, İzmir Institute of Technology, İzmir 35433, Türkiye.
Fevzi Yasin KababulutMinistry of Transportation, İzmir 35070, Türkiye.
Mehmet KuntalpDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir 35160, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-3381-9026

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The correct diagnosis and early treatment of respiratory diseases can significantly improve the health status of patients, reduce healthcare expenses, and enhance quality of life. Therefore, there has been extensive interest in developing automatic respiratory disease detection systems. Most recent methods for detecting respiratory disease use machine and deep learning algorithms. The success of these machine learning methods depends heavily on the selection of proper features to be used in the classifier. Although metaheuristic-based feature selection methods have been successful in addressing difficulties presented by high-dimensional medical data in various biomedical classification tasks, there is not much research on the utilization of metaheuristic methods in respiratory disease classification. This paper aims to conduct a detailed and comparative analysis of six widely used metaheuristic optimization methods using eight different transfer functions in respiratory disease classification. For this purpose, two different classification cases were examined: binary and multi-class. The findings demonstrate that metaheuristic algorithms using correct transfer functions could effectively reduce data dimensionality while enhancing classification accuracy.

Indexed as

feature selectionmetaheuristicrespiratory disease classification

Identifiers

PMID39410648
PMCPMC11475976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.