Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39410640›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Return-to-Play Post-Myocarditis for Athletes: To Play or Not to Play?

Kentaro Yamagata, Aneil Malhotra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kentaro YamagataInstitute of Sport, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M1 7EL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4124-6421
Aneil MalhotraInstitute of Sport, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M1 7EL, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myocarditis is a condition marked by inflammation of the heart muscle, which can lead to serious outcomes such as sudden cardiac death (SCD) and life-threatening arrhythmias. While myocarditis can affect any population, athletes, especially those engaged in high-intensity training, are at increased risk due to factors such as reduced immunity and increased exposure to pathogens. This review examines the clinical presentation, current guidelines, diagnostic challenges, and the significance of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in detecting myocardial inflammation and scarring. Current guidelines recommend a period of exercise restriction followed by thorough reassessment before athletes can return-to-play (RTP). However, there are several knowledge gaps, including the implications of persistent late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on CMR and the optimal duration of exercise restriction. Additionally, the psychological impact of myocarditis on athletes highlights the importance of incorporating mental health support in the recovery process. A shared decision-making approach should be encouraged in RTP, considering the athlete's overall health, personal preferences, and the potential risks of resuming competitive sports. We have proposed an algorithm for RTP in athletes following myocarditis, incorporating CMR. Future research is warranted to refine RTP protocols and improve risk stratification, particularly through longitudinal studies that examine recovery and outcomes in athletes.

Indexed as

athletescardiac magnetic resonance imagingmyocarditisreturn-to-play

Identifiers

PMID39410640
PMCPMC11475062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.