ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Return-to-Play Post-Myocarditis for Athletes: To Play or Not to Play?
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Preparticipation Screening to Diagnosis: Long-Term Outcomes of Athletes with Ventricular Repolarization Abnormalities and Normal Echocardiography.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Myocarditis in the Modern Era: Navigating Diagnosis, Innovative Treatments, the COVID-19 Challenge and the Role of Artificial Intelligence.Cardiology research and practice · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myocarditis is a condition marked by inflammation of the heart muscle, which can lead to serious outcomes such as sudden cardiac death (SCD) and life-threatening arrhythmias. While myocarditis can affect any population, athletes, especially those engaged in high-intensity training, are at increased risk due to factors such as reduced immunity and increased exposure to pathogens. This review examines the clinical presentation, current guidelines, diagnostic challenges, and the significance of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in detecting myocardial inflammation and scarring. Current guidelines recommend a period of exercise restriction followed by thorough reassessment before athletes can return-to-play (RTP). However, there are several knowledge gaps, including the implications of persistent late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on CMR and the optimal duration of exercise restriction. Additionally, the psychological impact of myocarditis on athletes highlights the importance of incorporating mental health support in the recovery process. A shared decision-making approach should be encouraged in RTP, considering the athlete's overall health, personal preferences, and the potential risks of resuming competitive sports. We have proposed an algorithm for RTP in athletes following myocarditis, incorporating CMR. Future research is warranted to refine RTP protocols and improve risk stratification, particularly through longitudinal studies that examine recovery and outcomes in athletes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.