ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Assessing Quality of Ultrasound Attenuation Coefficient Results for Liver Fat Quantification.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Non-invasive imaging diagnostic techniques in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: a roadmap for clinicians.Hormones (Athens, Greece) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesAlgorithms for quantifying liver fat content based on the ultrasound attenuation coefficient (AC) are currently available; however, little is known about whether their accuracy increases by applying quality criteria such as the interquartile range-to-median ratio (IQR/M) or whether the median or average AC value should be used.
methodsAC measurements were performed with the Aplio i800 ultrasound system using the attenuation imaging (ATI) algorithm (Canon Medical Systems, Otawara, Tochigi, Japan). Magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) was the reference standard. The diagnostic performance of the AC median value of 5 measurements (AC-M) was compared to that of AC average value (AC-A) of 5 or 3 acquisitions and different levels of IQR/M for median values or standard deviation/average (SD/A) for average values were also analyzed. Concordance between AC-5M, AC-5A, and AC3A was evaluated with concordance correlation coefficient (CCC).
resultsA total of 182 individuals (94 females; mean age, 51.2y [SD: 15]) were evaluated. A total of 77 (42.3%) individuals had S0 steatosis (MRI-PDFF < 6%), 75 (41.2%) S1 (MRI-PDFF 6-17%), 10 (5.5%) S2 (MRI-PDFF 17.1-22%), and 20 (11%) S3 (MRI-PDFF ≥ 22.1%). Concordance of AC-5A and AC-3A with AC-5M was excellent (CCC: 0.99 and 0.96, respectively). The correlation with MRI-PDFF was almost perfect. Diagnostic accuracy of AC-5M, AC-5A, and AC3A was not significantly affected by different levels of IQR/M or SD/A.
conclusionsThe accuracy of AC in quantifying liver fat content was not affected by reducing the number of acquisitions (from five to three), by using the mean instead of the median, or by reducing the IQR/M or SD/A to ≤5%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.