Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39410573›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Detection of Thymoma Disease Using mRMR Feature Selection and Transformer Models.

Mehmet Agar, Siyami Aydin, Muharrem Cakmak, Mustafa Koc, Mesut Togacar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mehmet AgarDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Firat University, 23119 Elazig, Turkey.
Siyami AydinDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Firat University, 23119 Elazig, Turkey.
Muharrem CakmakDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Firat University, 23119 Elazig, Turkey.
Mustafa KocDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Firat University, 23119 Elazig, Turkey.
Mesut TogacarDepartment of Management Information Systems, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Firat University, 23119 Elazig, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-8264-3899

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThymoma is a tumor that originates in the thymus gland, a part of the human body located behind the breastbone. It is a malignant disease that is rare in children but more common in adults and usually does not spread outside the thymus. The exact cause of thymic disease is not known, but it is thought to be more common in people infected with the EBV virus at an early age. Various surgical methods are used in clinical settings to treat thymoma. Expert opinion is very important in the diagnosis of the disease. Recently, next-generation technologies have become increasingly important in disease detection. Today's early detection systems already use transformer models that are open to technological advances.

methodsWhat makes this study different is the use of transformer models instead of traditional deep learning models. The data used in this study were obtained from patients undergoing treatment at Fırat University, Department of Thoracic Surgery. The dataset consisted of two types of classes: thymoma disease images and non-thymoma disease images. The proposed approach consists of preprocessing, model training, feature extraction, feature set fusion between models, efficient feature selection, and classification. In the preprocessing step, unnecessary regions of the images were cropped, and the region of interest (ROI) technique was applied. Four types of transformer models (Deit3, Maxvit, Swin, and ViT) were used for model training. As a result of the training of the models, the feature sets obtained from the best three models were merged between the models (Deit3 and Swin, Deit3 and ViT, Deit3 and ViT, Swin and ViT, and Deit3 and Swin and ViT). The combined feature set of the model (Deit3 and ViT) that gave the best performance with fewer features was analyzed using the mRMR feature selection method. The SVM method was used in the classification process.

resultsWith the mRMR feature selection method, 100% overall accuracy was achieved with feature sets containing fewer features. The cross-validation technique was used to verify the overall accuracy of the proposed approach and 99.22% overall accuracy was achieved in the analysis with this technique.

conclusionsThese findings emphasize the added value of the proposed approach in the detection of thymoma.

Indexed as

feature fusionfeature selectionthymoma detectionthymoma diseasetransformer model

Identifiers

PMID39410573
PMCPMC11476294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.