ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Advancing Kidney Transplantation: A Machine Learning Approach to Enhance Donor-Recipient Matching.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence-driven kidney organ allocation: systematic review of clinical outcome prediction, ethical frameworks, and decision-making algorithms.BMC nephrology · 2025Pooled it
- Predicting delayed graft function after kidney transplant: Do complex models help compared to standard statistics?World journal of nephrology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in nephrology: predicting CKD progression and personalizing treatment.International urology and nephrology · 2026Review
- A Comprehensive Review of Strategies to Advance Kidney Exchange Programs and Optimize Effectiveness and Outcomes.Kidney international reports · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in chronic kidney disease: Early detection, risk prediction, and personalized treatment strategies.World journal of nephrology · 2026Review
- Review
- Transforming organ donation and transplantation: challenges, innovations, and future directions.Frontiers in transplantation · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in kidney transplantation: a 30-year bibliometric analysis of research trends, innovations, and future directions.Renal failure · 2025Review
- Efficient Detection of Stigmatizing Language in Electronic Health Records via In-Context Learning: Comparative Analysis and Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Advancing Cardiovascular, Kidney, and Metabolic Medicine: A Narrative Review of Insights and Innovations for the Future.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: Globally, the kidney donor shortage has made the allocation process critical for patients awaiting a kidney transplant. Adopting Machine Learning (ML) models for donor-recipient matching can potentially improve kidney allocation processes when compared with traditional points-based systems. (2) Methods: This study developed an ML-based approach for donor-recipient matching. A comprehensive evaluation was conducted using ten widely used classifiers (logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, support vector machine, gradient boosting, boost, CatBoost, LightGBM, naive Bayes, and neural networks) across three experimental scenarios to ensure a robust approach. The first scenario used the original dataset, the second used a merged version of the dataset, and the last scenario used a hierarchical architecture model. Additionally, a custom ranking algorithm was designed to identify the most suitable recipients. Finally, the ML-based donor-recipient matching model was integrated into a web-based platform called Nephron. (3) Results: The gradient boost model was the top performer, achieving a remarkable and consistent accuracy rate of 98% across the three experimental scenarios. Furthermore, the custom ranking algorithm outperformed the conventional cosine and Jaccard similarity methods in identifying the most suitable recipients. Importantly, the platform not only facilitated efficient patient selection and prioritisation for kidney allocation but can be flexibly adapted for other solid organ allocation systems built on similar criteria. (4) Conclusions: This study proposes an ML-based approach to optimize donor-recipient matching within the kidney allocation process. Successful implementation of this methodology demonstrates significant potential to enhance both efficiency and fairness in kidney transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.