Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39410523›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Advancing Kidney Transplantation: A Machine Learning Approach to Enhance Donor-Recipient Matching.

Nahed Alowidi, Razan Ali, Munera Sadaqah, Fatmah M A Naemi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Advancing Cardiovascular, Kidney, and Metabolic Medicine: A Narrative Review of Insights and Innovations for the Future.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nahed AlowidiDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-4683-3716
Razan AliDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.
Munera SadaqahDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.
Fatmah M A NaemiHistocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, King Fahad General Hospital, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-5701-1865

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Globally, the kidney donor shortage has made the allocation process critical for patients awaiting a kidney transplant. Adopting Machine Learning (ML) models for donor-recipient matching can potentially improve kidney allocation processes when compared with traditional points-based systems. (2) Methods: This study developed an ML-based approach for donor-recipient matching. A comprehensive evaluation was conducted using ten widely used classifiers (logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, support vector machine, gradient boosting, boost, CatBoost, LightGBM, naive Bayes, and neural networks) across three experimental scenarios to ensure a robust approach. The first scenario used the original dataset, the second used a merged version of the dataset, and the last scenario used a hierarchical architecture model. Additionally, a custom ranking algorithm was designed to identify the most suitable recipients. Finally, the ML-based donor-recipient matching model was integrated into a web-based platform called Nephron. (3) Results: The gradient boost model was the top performer, achieving a remarkable and consistent accuracy rate of 98% across the three experimental scenarios. Furthermore, the custom ranking algorithm outperformed the conventional cosine and Jaccard similarity methods in identifying the most suitable recipients. Importantly, the platform not only facilitated efficient patient selection and prioritisation for kidney allocation but can be flexibly adapted for other solid organ allocation systems built on similar criteria. (4) Conclusions: This study proposes an ML-based approach to optimize donor-recipient matching within the kidney allocation process. Successful implementation of this methodology demonstrates significant potential to enhance both efficiency and fairness in kidney transplantation.

Indexed as

donor–recipient matchingintelligent allocationkidney transplantationmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID39410523
PMCPMC11475881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.