Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39410337›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024

The Performance of Partial Least Squares Methods in Virtual Nanosensor Array-Multiple Metal Ions Sensing Based on Multispectral Fluorescence of Quantum Dots.

Klaudia Głowacz, Mikołaj Cieślak, Patrycja Ciosek-Skibińska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Klaudia GłowaczChair of Medical Biotechnology, Faculty of Chemistry, Warsaw University of Technology, Noakowskiego 3, 00-664 Warsaw, Poland.
Mikołaj CieślakChair of Medical Biotechnology, Faculty of Chemistry, Warsaw University of Technology, Noakowskiego 3, 00-664 Warsaw, Poland.
Patrycja Ciosek-SkibińskaChair of Medical Biotechnology, Faculty of Chemistry, Warsaw University of Technology, Noakowskiego 3, 00-664 Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

National Science Centre UMO-2018/30/E/ST4/00481National Science Centre UMO-2023/49/N/ST4/00758
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The design of chemical sensors and probes is usually based on selective receptors for individual analytes, however, many analytical tasks are dedicated to multi-analyte sensing or recognizing properties of the sample related to more than one analyte. While it is possible to simultaneously use multiple sensors/receptors in such cases, multi-responsive probes could be an attractive alternative. In this work, we use thiomalic acid-capped CdTe quantum dots as a multiple-response receptor for the detection and quantification of six heavy metal cations: Ag(I), Cd(II), Co(II), Cu(II), Ni(II), and Pb(II) at micromolar concentration levels. Multiplexing is realized via multispectral fluorescence (so-called virtual sensor array). For such a sensing strategy, the effective decoding of the excitation-emission spectrum is essential. Herein, we show how various parameters of chemometric analysis by the Partial Least Squares method, such as preprocessing type and data structure, influence the performance of discrimination and quantification of the heavy metals. The established models are characterized by respective performance metrics (accuracy, sensitivity, precision, specificity/RMSE, a, b, R

Indexed as

excitation–emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopymetal ionsmulti-analyte detectionmulti-parameter sensormultiple-response receptormulti-responsive probemultispectral fluorescencePLS analysisquantum dotsvirtual sensor array

Identifiers

PMID39410337
PMCPMC11477732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.