Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39410288›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024

A Review of Non-Powder-Bed Metal Additive Manufacturing: Techniques and Challenges.

Jie Xu, Yifan Fei, Yuanzhe Zhu, Wei Yu, Donggang Yao, Jack G Zhou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jie XuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-8697-9273
Yifan FeiSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211167, China.
Yuanzhe ZhuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Wei YuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Donggang YaoSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7012-9377
Jack G ZhouDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-5475-0140

Funding

National Science Foundation 2027823National Science Foundation 2027871
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metal additive manufacturing has significantly evolved since the 1990s, achieving a market valuation of USD 6.36 billion in 2022, with an anticipated compound annual growth rate of 24.2% from 2023 to 2030. While powder-bed-based methods like powder bed fusion and binder jetting dominate the market due to their high accuracy and resolution, they face challenges such as lengthy build times, excessive costs, and safety concerns. Non-powder-bed-based techniques, including direct energy deposition, material extrusion, and sheet lamination, offer advantages such as larger build sizes and lower energy consumption but also encounter issues like residual stress and poor surface finish. The existing reviews of non-powder-bed-based metal additive manufacturing are restricted to one technical branch or one specific material. This survey investigates and analyzes each non-powder-bed-based technique in terms of its manufacturing method, materials, product quality, and summary for easy understanding and comparison. Innovative designs and research status are included.

Indexed as

direct energy depositionmanufacturing methodsmaterial extrusionmetal additive manufacturingproduct qualitysheet lamination

Identifiers

PMID39410288
PMCPMC11478304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.