ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
A Multi-Layer Multi-Pass Weld Bead Cross-Section Morphology Extraction Method Based on Row-Column Grayscale Segmentation.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Dual-Modal Robot Welding Trajectory Generation Scheme for Motion Based on Stereo Vision and Deep Learning.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the field of welding detection, weld bead cross-section morphology serves as a crucial indicator for analyzing welding quality. However, the extraction of weld bead cross-section morphology often relies on manual extraction based on human expertise, which can be limited in consistency and operational efficiency. To address this issue, this paper proposes a multi-layer multi-pass weld bead cross-section morphology extraction method based on row-column grayscale segmentation. The weld bead cross-section morphology image is pre-processed and then segmented into rows and columns based on the average gray value of the image. In order to extract the feature of multi-layer multi-pass weld feature images, an outline showing the binarization threshold is selected for each segmented image (ESI). Then, the weld contour of ESI is extracted before image fusion and morphological processing. Finally, the weld feature parameters (circumference, area, etc.) are extracted from the obtained weld feature image. The results indicate that the relative errors in circumference and area are within 10%, while the discrepancies in maximum weld seam width and maximum weld seam height can be close to the true value. The quality assessment falls within a reasonable range, the average value of SSIM is above 0.9 and the average value of PSNR is above 60 on average. The results demonstrate that this method is feasible for extracting the general contour features of multi-layer multi-pass weld bead cross-section morphology images, providing a basis for further detailed analysis and improvement in welding quality assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.