ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Evaluation of High Vacuum Flavor Extraction Device as a Novel Technique for the Extraction of Volatile Compounds.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, a high vacuum flavor extraction (HVE) device was developed to address the limitations of traditional extraction methods, such as extended extraction times and artifact generation during high-temperature processes. Firstly, the repeatability and precision of the HVE method were evaluated through quantitative analysis of twelve volatile odor compounds across seven replicate extractions using gas chromatography-flame ionization detection (GC-FID). The results showed that the HVE system achieved a mean relative standard deviation (RSD) of 11.60 ± 1.79% and a recovery rate of 90.55 ± 4.56%, demonstrating its precision and reproducibility. Secondly, the performance of HVE was compared with solvent-assisted flavor evaporation (SAFE) and simultaneous distillation-extraction (SDE) for extracting flavor compounds from fried tilapia mince. The results indicated that HVE was more effective, particularly in extracting aldehydes and pyrazines, which are key contributors to the flavor profile. Finally, sensory evaluations supported these findings, showing that the odor profiles obtained through HVE were most similar to the original sample, with a similarity score of 72.55%, compared to 69.25% for SAFE and 60.29% for SDE. These findings suggest that HVE is a suitable method for the extraction and analysis of volatile compounds in complex food matrices such as fried tilapia mince.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.