Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39410194›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Changes in the Objective Indices Related to Meat Quality of Porcine

Xianrui Zheng, Bo Wang, Lisha Shi, Ziyang Wang, Fangyuan Zheng, Yunjiang Xiong, Feiyan Li, Yueyun Ding, Xiaodong Zhang, Zongjun Yin

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xianrui ZhengCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.
Bo WangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.
Lisha ShiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.
Ziyang WangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.
Fangyuan ZhengCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.
Yunjiang XiongCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.
Feiyan LiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.
Yueyun DingCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7559-0736
Xiaodong ZhangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4677-1620
Zongjun YinCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9893-743X

Funding

Major special science and technology project of Anhui Province 202103a06020013National Key research and development Program of China 2021YFD1301200the Cooperative Innovation Project of Anhui Provincial Universities GXXT-2023-059the Joint Research Project on Local Pig Breeding in Anhui Province 340000211260001000431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quality of frozen pork is adversely affected upon thawing. In this study, the influence of various thawing methods for frozen pork, including cold water (18 °C), room temperature (18 °C), and refrigeration (4 °C) thawing, on physicochemical and nutrient substances were examined. The pork samples (a Chinese local breed: Anqing six-end-white pigs), which were thawed through the above conditions, were compared with controls (fresh porcine

Indexed as

amino acidsfatty acidslongissimus dorsimeat qualityporkthawing method

Identifiers

PMID39410194
PMCPMC11475974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.