Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39410082›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024

A Review on Gas Indicators and Sensors for Smart Food Packaging.

Wonyoung Heo, Seokwon Lim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wonyoung HeoDepartment of Food Science & Biotechnology, Gachon University, 1342 Seongnam-daero, Sujeong-gu, Seongnam-si 13120, Republic of Korea.
Seokwon LimDepartment of Food Science & Biotechnology, Gachon University, 1342 Seongnam-daero, Sujeong-gu, Seongnam-si 13120, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9974-2052

Funding

Gachon University GL-202301320001Ministry of Food and Drug Safety 22193 MFDS 468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real-time monitoring of changes in packaged food is crucial to ensure safety and alleviate environmental issues. Accordingly, the development of indicators and sensors for smart packaging has long been anticipated, especially for gases related to food deterioration and microbial growth. However, the characteristics of indicators and sensors used in food packaging cannot be adjusted according to the specific food type, making it essential to select and apply suitable indicators and sensors for each type of food. In this review, the principles and characteristics of gas indicators and sensors for oxygen, carbon dioxide, and ammonia that are commercialized or in the development phase were summarized, and their application status and prospects were assessed. Indicators and sensors for smart packaging are applied in forms such as films, labels, sachets, and devices. Their detection methods include redox reactions, analyte binding, enzyme reactions, pH changes, electron transfer, conformational changes, and electrode reactions. In this work, 9 types of indicators and sensors for oxygen, carbon dioxide, and ammonia were evaluated based on their detection and indication methods, materials, sensitivity, detection range, limit of detection, and advantages and disadvantages in food applications. We anticipate our review will propose criteria for selecting the optimal indicators and sensors for specific foods. Furthermore, this review examines the current application status and future prospects of these indicators and sensors.

Indexed as

ammoniacarbon dioxideindicatorsoxygensensorssmart packaging

Identifiers

PMID39410082
PMCPMC11475838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.