ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024
A Review on Gas Indicators and Sensors for Smart Food Packaging.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A New Paradigm for Sustainable Food Packaging: Construction, Properties, and Applications of Multifunctional Hydrogels.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Carotenoids From Amazonian Fruits as Functional Pigments in Active and Intelligent Food Packaging: Materials, Stability, and Technological Performance.Journal of food science · 2026Review
- Balancing Functionality and Safety in Food Packaging Coatings.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advances and Challenges in Smart Packaging Technologies for the Food Industry: Trends, Applications, and Sustainability Considerations.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Development and Evaluation of a BCG/BCP-Based Cellulose Acetate Freshness Indicator for Beef Loin During Cold Storage.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Nanomaterials for Smart and Sustainable Food Packaging: Nano-Sensing Mechanisms, and Regulatory Perspectives.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Biopolymer-based electrospun nanofiber membranes for smart food packaging applications: a review.RSC advances · 2025Review
- Insights of freshness phenotype detection for postharvest fruit and vegetables.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Real-time monitoring of changes in packaged food is crucial to ensure safety and alleviate environmental issues. Accordingly, the development of indicators and sensors for smart packaging has long been anticipated, especially for gases related to food deterioration and microbial growth. However, the characteristics of indicators and sensors used in food packaging cannot be adjusted according to the specific food type, making it essential to select and apply suitable indicators and sensors for each type of food. In this review, the principles and characteristics of gas indicators and sensors for oxygen, carbon dioxide, and ammonia that are commercialized or in the development phase were summarized, and their application status and prospects were assessed. Indicators and sensors for smart packaging are applied in forms such as films, labels, sachets, and devices. Their detection methods include redox reactions, analyte binding, enzyme reactions, pH changes, electron transfer, conformational changes, and electrode reactions. In this work, 9 types of indicators and sensors for oxygen, carbon dioxide, and ammonia were evaluated based on their detection and indication methods, materials, sensitivity, detection range, limit of detection, and advantages and disadvantages in food applications. We anticipate our review will propose criteria for selecting the optimal indicators and sensors for specific foods. Furthermore, this review examines the current application status and future prospects of these indicators and sensors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.