Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39410060›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Research Progress of Machine Learning in Extending and Regulating the Shelf Life of Fruits and Vegetables.

Dawei Li, Lin Bai, Rong Wang, Sun Ying

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dawei LiCollege of Light Industry Science and Engineering, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China.
Lin BaiCollege of Light Industry Science and Engineering, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China.
Rong WangSchool of Computer and Artificial Intelligence, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China.
Sun YingCollege of Light Industry Science and Engineering, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China.

Funding

the Beijing Natural Science Foundation General Project 6242004the R&D Program of the Beijing Municipal Commission of Education KM202210011006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fruits and vegetables are valued for their flavor and high nutritional content, but their perishability and seasonality present challenges for storage and marketing. To address these, it is essential to accurately monitor their quality and predict shelf life. Unlike traditional methods, machine learning efficiently handles large datasets, identifies complex patterns, and builds predictive models to estimate food shelf life. These models can be continuously refined with new data, improving accuracy and robustness over time. This article discusses key machine learning methods for predicting shelf life and quality control of fruits and vegetables, with a focus on storage conditions, physicochemical properties, and non-destructive testing. It emphasizes advances such as dataset expansion, model optimization, multi-model fusion, and integration of deep learning and non-destructive testing. These developments aim to reduce resource waste, provide theoretical basis and technical guidance for the formation of modern intelligent agricultural supply chains, promote sustainable green development of the food industry, and foster interdisciplinary integration in the field of artificial intelligence.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencefood processingfood safety and qualitymachine learningshelf life predictionvegetables and fruits

Identifiers

PMID39410060
PMCPMC11475079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.