Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39410038›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

The Importance of Real-World Data in Evaluating the Safety of Biosimilars: A Descriptive Study of Clinical Practice in an Oncohematological Italian Population.

Silvana A M Urru, Flavia Mayer, Stefania Spila Alegiani, Francesca Paoloni, Anna Guella, Roberta Murru, Giampaolo Bucaneve, Giulio Formoso, Vito Racanelli, Isacco Ferrarini and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Silvana A M UrruHospital Pharmacy Unit, Trento General Hospital, Autonomous Province of Trento, 38122 Trento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6213-1290
Flavia MayerPharmacoepidemiology Unit, National Center for Drug Research and Evaluation, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Stefania Spila AlegianiPharmacoepidemiology Unit, National Center for Drug Research and Evaluation, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0656-1346
Francesca PaoloniFondazione GIMEMA Onlus, 00187 Rome, Italy.
Anna GuellaSection of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Department of Medicine, APSS Trento, Autonomous Province of Trento, 38122 Trento, Italy.
Roberta MurruHematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Ospedale Oncologico A. Businco, ARNAS G. Brotzu, 09134 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9792-9542
Giampaolo BucaneveOspedale S. Maria della Misericordia, 06129 Perugia, Italy.
Giulio FormosoAzienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42122 Reggio Emilia, RE, Italy.
Vito RacanelliDepartment of Medicine, APSS Trento, Autonomous Province of Trento, 38122 Trento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8639-1940
Isacco FerrariniSection of Haematology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9867-8335
Claudio FozzaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy.
Giuseppe LongoOncological Medicine Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Modena, 41125 Modena, Italy.
Felice MusiccoRegina Elena San Gallicano IRCCS di Roma, 00144 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9388-0304
Annalisa CampomoriHospital Pharmacy Unit, Trento General Hospital, Autonomous Province of Trento, 38122 Trento, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical safety and efficacy of rituximab biosimilars compared to the reference rituximab (Mabthera) have been well established in randomized trials. However, concerns persist regarding the safety of changing from the reference product to biosimilars, and particularly between different biosimilars. This prospective multicenter observational study was conducted in 13 oncohematology units of eight Italian regions. The study included 800 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who received rituximab between March 2018 and June 2022. To minimize survivorship bias, only newly diagnosed patients (i.e., those without prior rituximab treatment) were included in the analysis of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Thus, this study focused on 505 incident cases (79.8% of the initial cohort) from 13 centers. A total of 3681 rituximab infusions were administered, and 16.8% of the patients experienced at least one ADR. These were observed most frequently during the first infusion (44 patients, 52%) and the second infusion (17 patients, 20%). The most frequent reactions were general disorders and administration site conditions (n. 50, 8% serious). These findings support the clinical safety of rituximab biosimilars and suggest that switching between biosimilars does not increase the risk of adverse events. This evidence may alleviate concerns about biosimilar use, potentially leading to broader acceptance and reduced healthcare costs.

Indexed as

biosimilarschronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL)oncohematologyrituximabsafety

Identifiers

PMID39410038
PMCPMC11476336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.