ReviewCancers2024
Advancement and Challenges in Monitoring of CAR-T Cell Therapy: A Comprehensive Review of Parameters and Markers in Hematological Malignancies.
Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biocompatible Glycoconjugation Enables Sensitive In Vivo Cell Tracking by PET/CT.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- Systematic Review of Immunosuppression After Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy for Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder.Kidney international reports · 2026Article
- Cytokine-Engineered Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cell Therapy: How to Balance the Efficacy and Toxicity.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- The role of advanced diagnostics on precision medicine in hemato oncology.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- The Potential Use of Digital Twin Technology for Advancing CAR-T Cell Therapy.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- An Analysis of Monitoring Solutions for CAR T Cell Production.Healthcare technology lettersReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has revolutionized the treatment for relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphomas. Despite its success, this therapy is accompanied by a significant frequency of adverse events, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune-effector-cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), or cytopenias, reaching even up to 80% of patients following CAR-T cell therapy. CRS results from the uncontrolled overproduction of proinflammatory cytokines, which leads to symptoms such as fever, headache, hypoxia, or neurological complications. CAR-T cell detection is possible by the use of flow cytometry (FC) or quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays, the two primary techniques used for CAR-T evaluation in peripheral blood, bone marrow (BM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). State-of-the-art imaging technologies play a crucial role in monitoring the distribution and persistence of CAR-T cells in clinical trials. Still, they can also be extended with the use of FC and digital PCR (dPCR). Monitoring the changes in cell populations during disease progression and treatment gives an important insight into how the response to CAR-T cell therapy develops on a cellular level. It can help improve the therapeutic design and optimize CAR-T cell therapy to make it more precise and personalized, which is crucial to overcoming the problem of tumor relapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.