ReviewCancers2024
Deep Learning for Image Analysis in the Diagnosis and Management of Esophageal Cancer.
Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy for Predicting Invasion Depth of Superficial Esophageal Mucosal Lesions: A Cohort Study.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Hyperspectral reconstruction of white light endoscopy images for enhanced segmentation of early esophageal lesions in patients.iScience · 2026Article
- A transformer-based multi-modal fusion framework for laryngeal lesion classification using contact endoscopy.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Automated tumor regression grade assessment and survival prediction in esophageal cancer via weakly supervised multiple instance learning.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Advances in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy-An Overview of Recent Developments and a Novel Classification of Innovations in Treatment of Thoracic Esophageal Cancer.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Future of image enhanced endoscopy of esophageal adenocarcinoma.Clinical endoscopy · 2025Review
- Review
- Edge Artificial Intelligence Device in Real-Time Endoscopy for Classification of Gastric Neoplasms: Development and Validation Study.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Esophageal cancer has a dismal prognosis and necessitates a multimodal and multidisciplinary approach from diagnosis to treatment. High-definition white-light endoscopy and histopathological confirmation remain the gold standard for the definitive diagnosis of premalignant and malignant lesions. Artificial intelligence using deep learning (DL) methods for image analysis constitutes a promising adjunct for the clinical endoscopist that could effectively decrease BE overdiagnosis and unnecessary surveillance, while also assisting in the timely detection of dysplastic BE and esophageal cancer. A plethora of studies published during the last five years have consistently reported highly accurate DL algorithms with comparable or superior performance compared to endoscopists. Recent efforts aim to expand DL utilization into further aspects of esophageal neoplasia management including histologic diagnosis, segmentation of gross tumor volume, pretreatment prediction and post-treatment evaluation of patient response to systemic therapy and operative guidance during minimally invasive esophagectomy. Our manuscript serves as an introduction to the growing literature of DL applications for image analysis in the management of esophageal neoplasia, concisely presenting all currently published studies. We also aim to guide the clinician across basic functional principles, evaluation metrics and limitations of DL for image recognition to facilitate the comprehension and critical evaluation of the presented studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.