ArticleCancers2024
Signature Genes Selection and Functional Analysis of Astrocytoma Phenotypes: A Comparative Study.
Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Novel cancer biomarkers discoveries are driven by the application of omics technologies. The vast quantity of highly dimensional data necessitates the implementation of feature selection. The mathematical basis of different selection methods varies considerably, which may influence subsequent inferences. In the study, feature selection and classification methods were employed to identify six signature gene sets of grade 2 and 3 astrocytoma samples from the Rembrandt repository. Subsequently, the impact of these variables on classification and further discovery of biological patterns was analysed. Principal component analysis (PCA), uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP), and hierarchical clustering revealed that the data set (10,096 genes) exhibited a high degree of noise, feature redundancy, and lack of distinct patterns. The application of feature selection methods resulted in a reduction in the number of genes to between 28 and 128. Notably, no single gene was selected by all of the methods tested. Selection led to an increase in classification accuracy and noise reduction. Significant differences in the Gene Ontology terms were discovered, with only 13 terms overlapping. One selection method did not result in any enriched terms. KEGG pathway analysis revealed only one pathway in common (cell cycle), while the two methods did not yield any enriched pathways. The results demonstrated a significant difference in outcomes when classification-type algorithms were utilised in comparison to mixed types (selection and classification). This may result in the inadvertent omission of biological phenomena, while simultaneously achieving enhanced classification outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.