ReviewCancers2024
Revisiting HER2 in Prostate Cancer from an Inclusive Perspective: From Biomarkers to Omics.
Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Genomic Mutations on the Transcriptional Pathways and Tumor Microenvironment Landscape of Localized Early Prostate Cancer.The Prostate · 2026Article
- The Evolving Landscape of Novel and Old Biomarkers in Localized High-Risk Prostate Cancer: State of the Art, Clinical Utility, and Limitations Toward Precision Oncology.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Collision metastasis in a pelvic lymph node from urothelial and prostatic carcinoma: a rare case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a major driver of disease progression, treatment resistance, and worse survival for patients with various types of cancers, including prostate cancer. However, key bench studies and clinical trials have failed to evaluate the role of HER2 in prostate cancer using racially diverse experimental designs and protocols. This lack of diversity represents what has been the status quo of cancer research in the United States for decades. In the case of prostate cancer, homogenic study designs are problematic as Black men are much more likely to be diagnosed and die from aggressive and incurable forms of the disease. Therefore, the strategic inclusion of biospecimens collected from Black patients as well as the recruitment and enrollment of Black men into prostate cancer clinical trials is necessary to comprehensively evaluate genetic and molecular factors that contribute to variable outcomes in this high-risk population. Additionally, a higher prevalence of HER2 expression in Black men was recently reported in a small cohort of prostate cancer patients and may contribute to worsened prognosis. In this review, we carefully consider the role of HER2 in prostate cancer while, for the first time, taking into account the influences of race and genetic ancestry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.