Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39409812›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

Use of Precision Feeding during Lactation Improves the Productive Yields of Sows and Their Piglets under Commercial Farm Conditions.

María Aparicio, Natalia Yeste-Vizcaíno, Joaquín Morales, Nerea Soria, Beatriz Isabel, Carlos Piñeiro, Antonio González-Bulnes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

María AparicioAnimal Data Analytics, S.L., C/ Dámaso Alonso 14, 40006 Segovia, Spain.
Natalia Yeste-VizcaínoCuarte S.L., Grupo Jorge, Ctra. de Logroño km 9.2, Monzalbarba, 50120 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2471-2064
Joaquín MoralesAnimal Data Analytics, S.L., C/ Dámaso Alonso 14, 40006 Segovia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0728-4862
Nerea SoriaCuarte S.L., Grupo Jorge, Ctra. de Logroño km 9.2, Monzalbarba, 50120 Zaragoza, Spain.
Beatriz IsabelFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, UCM, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6593-9500
Carlos PiñeiroAnimal Data Analytics, S.L., C/ Dámaso Alonso 14, 40006 Segovia, Spain.
Antonio González-BulnesCuarte S.L., Grupo Jorge, Ctra. de Logroño km 9.2, Monzalbarba, 50120 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0917-4475

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adequate nutritional management in maternities is one of the most challenging aspects of swine production. This study reports the results of two studies aiming to determine, under commercial farm conditions, the effects of precision feeding (electronic sow feeders, ESFs) on the production and economic yields of lactating sows and possible nutritional and metabolic differences when compared to a control group fed with traditional feeders. The first trial showed that sows fed with ESFs weaned heavier piglets than sows fed with traditional feeders. Feed intake during the lactation period was similar in the sows of both groups; consequently, the amount of feed per kg of weaned piglet was lower in the sows fed with ESFs, which is a remarkable economic output. The second trial confirmed these findings and showed that, despite similar feed intakes, the sows fed with ESFs had lower bodyweight losses during the lactation period, but there were no major differences in milk composition or metabolic traits of sows and piglets.

Indexed as

lactationnutritionprecision feedingsustainabilityswine

Identifiers

PMID39409812
PMCPMC11475156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.