Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39409685›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2024

An Assessment of Vegetation Changes in the Three-River Headwaters Region, China: Integrating NDVI and Its Spatial Heterogeneity.

Xuejie Mou, Huixia Chai, Cheng Duan, Yao Feng, Xiahui Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xuejie MouInstitute of Ecological Protection and Restoration Planning/Yellow River Ecology and Environment Protection Center, Chinese Academy of Environmental Planning, Beijing 100041, China.ORCID 0009-0002-6361-7457
Huixia ChaiInstitute of Ecological Protection and Restoration Planning/Yellow River Ecology and Environment Protection Center, Chinese Academy of Environmental Planning, Beijing 100041, China.
Cheng DuanInstitute of Ecological Protection and Restoration Planning/Yellow River Ecology and Environment Protection Center, Chinese Academy of Environmental Planning, Beijing 100041, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1843-1795
Yao FengKey Laboratory of Water Cycle and Related Land Surface Processes, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Xiahui WangInstitute of Ecological Protection and Restoration Planning/Yellow River Ecology and Environment Protection Center, Chinese Academy of Environmental Planning, Beijing 100041, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3884-8723

Funding

Strategic Research and Consulting Project of Chinese Academy of Engineering No. 2023-HYZD-04 & No. 2022-HZ-12the Second phase of the Yangtze River Ecological and Environmental Protection and Restoration Joint Research Project No. 2022-LHYJ-02-0102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing vegetation changes in alpine arid and fragile ecosystems is imperative for informed ecological restoration initiatives and adaptive ecosystem management. Previous studies primarily employed the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) to reveal vegetation dynamics, ignoring the spatial heterogeneity alterations caused by bare soil. In this study, we used a comprehensive analysis of NDVI and its spatial heterogeneity to examine the vegetation changes across the Three-River Headwaters Region (TRHR) over the past two decades. A random forest model was used to elucidate the underlying causes of these changes. We found that between 2000 and 2022, 9.4% of the regions exhibited significant changes in both NDVI and its spatial heterogeneity. These regions were categorized into six distinct types of vegetation change: improving conditions (62.1%), regrowing conditions (11.0%), slight degradation (16.2%), medium degradation (8.4%), severe degradation (2.0%), and desertification (0.3%). In comparison with steppe regions, meadows showed a greater proportion of improved conditions and medium degradation, whereas steppes had more instances of regrowth and slight degradation. Climate variables are the dominant factors that caused vegetation changes, with contributions to NDVI and spatial heterogeneity reaching 68.9% and 73.2%, respectively. Temperature is the primary driver of vegetation dynamics across the different types of change, with a more pronounced impact in meadows. In severely degraded steppe and meadow regions, grazing intensity emerged as the predominant driver of NDVI change, with an importance value exceeding 0.50. Notably, as degradation progressed from slight to severe, the significance of this factor correspondingly increased. Our findings can provide effective information for guiding the implementation of ecological restoration projects and the sustainable management of alpine arid ecosystems.

Indexed as

driving factorsrandom forestspatial heterogeneityThree-River Headwaters Region

Identifiers

PMID39409685
PMCPMC11479222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.