Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39409607›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Resistance Mechanisms of Plant Pathogenic Fungi to Fungicide, Environmental Impacts of Fungicides, and Sustainable Solutions.

Tarequl Islam, Danishuddin, Noshin Tabassum Tamanna, Muhammad Nurul Matin, Hasi Rani Barai, Md Azizul Haque

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Novel Skeleton Compound fromMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  9. DecodingPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  10. Estimating Efficacy of Indigenous Isolates of ThreeJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Antifungal Activity of NativeJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. PhyllosphereMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tarequl IslamDepartment of Microbiology, Noakhali Science and Technology University, Noakhali 3814, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-2172-7685
DanishuddinDepartment of Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9185-6709
Noshin Tabassum TamannaDepartment of Pharmacy, Noakhali Science and Technology University, Noakhali 3814, Bangladesh.
Muhammad Nurul MatinDepartment of Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3594-2570
Hasi Rani BaraiSchool of Mechanical and IT Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5915-8425
Md Azizul HaqueDepartment of Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5158-4558

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The significant reduction in agricultural output and the decline in product quality are two of the most glaring negative impacts caused by plant pathogenic fungi (PPF). Furthermore, contaminated food or transit might introduce mycotoxins produced by PPF directly into the food chain. Eating food tainted with mycotoxin is extremely dangerous for both human and animal health. Using fungicides is the first choice to control PPF or their toxins in food. Fungicide resistance and its effects on the environment and public health are becoming more and more of a concern, despite the fact that chemical fungicides are used to limit PPF toxicity and control growth in crops. Fungicides induce target site alteration and efflux pump activation, and mutations in PPF result in resistance. As a result, global trends are shifting away from chemically manufactured pesticides and toward managing fungal plant diseases using various biocontrol techniques, tactics, and approaches. However, surveillance programs to monitor fungicide resistance and their environmental impact are much fewer compared to bacterial antibiotic resistance surveillance programs. In this review, we discuss the PPF that contributes to disease development in plants, the fungicides used against them, factors causing the spread of PPF and the emergence of new strains, the antifungal resistance mechanisms of PPF, health, the environmental impacts of fungicides, and the use of biocontrol agents (BCAs), antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), and nanotechnologies to control PPF as a safe and eco-friendly alternative to fungicides.

Indexed as

antimicrobial peptidesantimicrobial resistancebiocontrol agentsemerging phytopathogens fungienvironmental changes

Identifiers

PMID39409607
PMCPMC11478979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.