Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39409604›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Chemical Markers in Italian Propolis: Chrysin, Galangin and CAPE as Indicators of Geographic Origin.

Elisabetta Miraldi, Giorgio Cappellucci, Giulia Baini, Elia Silvia Pistone, Marika Allodi, Gabriele Costantino, Chiara Spaggiari, Marco Biagi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elisabetta MiraldiDepartment of Physical Sciences, Earth and Environment, University of Siena, Via Laterina, 8, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2130-8624
Giorgio CappellucciDepartment of Physical Sciences, Earth and Environment, University of Siena, Via Laterina, 8, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0009-0001-2037-3133
Giulia BainiDepartment of Physical Sciences, Earth and Environment, University of Siena, Via Laterina, 8, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Elia Silvia PistoneSIFITLab, Italian Society of Phytotherapy, Via Laterina, 8, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Marika AllodiDepartment of Food and Drug, University of Parma (Department of Excellence 2023-2027), Parco Area delle Scienze, 43124 Parma, Italy.
Gabriele CostantinoDepartment of Food and Drug, University of Parma (Department of Excellence 2023-2027), Parco Area delle Scienze, 43124 Parma, Italy.
Chiara SpaggiariDepartment of Food and Drug, University of Parma (Department of Excellence 2023-2027), Parco Area delle Scienze, 43124 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7892-580X
Marco BiagiSIFITLab, Italian Society of Phytotherapy, Via Laterina, 8, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2997-4178

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge of the chemical composition of propolis is crucial for understanding the characteristics of products of different origins, but also for quality control and regulatory purposes. To date, official monographs or official analyses that allow researchers to evaluate propolis in a proper way have not yet been released. This study focuses on the characterization of twenty-seven Italian propolis samples and the identification of chemical markers that define its geographical provenance. Total polyphenol (TP) and total flavonoid (TF) content, alongside the quantification of pinocembrin, chrysin, galangin, and caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE), were identified as potential markers. Additionally, DPPH assays were conducted to evaluate the antiradical activity of propolis samples. Our findings demonstrated that TPs, TFs and pinocembrin differed in propolis of different origins, especially in samples from the islands. However, the quantification of the sum of chrysin and galangin and CAPE provided a clearer distinction of the geographical origin of the propolis samples. In contrast, the DPPH assay did not prove useful for this purpose, as most results were similar and, therefore, not significant. This study lays the groundwork for future research on propolis. These findings could contribute to the development of more refined methods for distinguishing propolis origins, enhancing the understanding, valuation and quality control of this natural product in various applications.

Indexed as

CAPEchrysinflavonoidsgeographical diversityItalian propolispinocembrin

Identifiers

PMID39409604
PMCPMC11478685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.