ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2024
High-Performance Grape Disease Detection Method Using Multimodal Data and Parallel Activation Functions.
Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing grape disease detection: A comparative analysis of hybrid CNN-LSTM and CNN methods.MethodsX · 2026Article
- A hybrid convolution and attention-based framework with visual explanation for fruit disease identification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- YOLOv11n-DualPC-Lite: a lightweight, high-precision real-time detection model for maize leaf diseases.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Automated Rice Seedling Segmentation and Unsupervised Health Assessment Using Segment Anything Model with Multi-Modal Feature Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper introduces a novel deep learning model for grape disease detection that integrates multimodal data and parallel heterogeneous activation functions, significantly enhancing detection accuracy and robustness. Through experiments, the model demonstrated excellent performance in grape disease detection, achieving an accuracy of 91%, a precision of 93%, a recall of 90%, a mean average precision (mAP) of 91%, and 56 frames per second (FPS), outperforming traditional deep learning models such as YOLOv3, YOLOv5, DEtection TRansformer (DETR), TinySegformer, and Tranvolution-GAN. To meet the demands of rapid on-site detection, this study also developed a lightweight model for mobile devices, successfully deployed on the iPhone 15. Techniques such as structural pruning, quantization, and depthwise separable convolution were used to significantly reduce the model's computational complexity and resource consumption, ensuring efficient operation and real-time performance. These achievements not only advance the development of smart agricultural technologies but also provide new technical solutions and practical tools for disease detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.