ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Technologies and Solutions for Cattle Tracking: A Review of the State of the Art.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- River transport of cattle in northern Brazil - a systematic review.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- ASAS-NANP SYMPOSIUM: mathematical modeling in animal nutrition: the importance of animal science flight simulators to enhance the competitiveness and sustainability of livestock production.Journal of animal science · 2026Review
- Automatic cattle identification system based on color point cloud using hybrid PointNet++ Siamese network.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- CFR-YOLO: A Novel Cow Face Detection Network Based on YOLOv7 Improvement.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article presents a systematic literature review of technologies and solutions for cattle tracking and monitoring based on a comprehensive analysis of scientific articles published since 2017. The main objective of this review is to identify the current state of the art and the trends in this field, as well as to provide a guide for selecting the most suitable solution according to the user's needs and preferences. This review covers various aspects of cattle tracking, such as the devices, sensors, power supply, wireless communication protocols, and software used to collect, process, and visualize the data. The review also compares the advantages and disadvantages of different solutions, such as collars, cameras, and drones, in terms of cost, scalability, precision, and invasiveness. The results show that there is a growing interest and innovation in livestock localization and tracking, with a focus on integrating and adapting various technologies for effective and reliable monitoring in real-world environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.