ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Transforming Motor Imagery Analysis: A Novel EEG Classification Framework Using AtSiftNet Method.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper presents an innovative approach for the Feature Extraction method using Self-Attention, incorporating various Feature Selection techniques known as the AtSiftNet method to enhance the classification performance of motor imaginary activities using electrophotography (EEG) signals. Initially, the EEG signals were sorted and then denoised using multiscale principal component analysis to obtain clean EEG signals. However, we also conducted a non-denoised experiment. Subsequently, the clean EEG signals underwent the Self-Attention feature extraction method to compute the features of each trial (i.e., 350×18). The best 1 or 15 features were then extracted through eight different feature selection techniques. Finally, five different machine learning and neural network classification models were employed to calculate the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of this approach. The BCI competition III dataset IV-a was utilized for all experiments, encompassing the datasets of five volunteers who participated in the competition. The experiment findings reveal that the average accuracy of classification is highest among ReliefF (i.e., 99.946%), Mutual Information (i.e., 98.902%), Independent Component Analysis (i.e., 99.62%), and Principal Component Analysis (i.e., 98.884%) for both 1 and 15 best-selected features from each trial. These accuracies were obtained for motor imagery using a Support Vector Machine (SVM) as a classifier. In addition, five-fold validation was performed in this paper to assess the fair performance estimation and robustness of the model. The average accuracy obtained through five-fold validation is 99.89%. The experiments' findings indicate that the suggested framework provides a resilient biomarker with minimal computational complexity, making it a suitable choice for advancing Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.