Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39409472›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Analyzing Optimal Wearable Motion Sensor Placement for Accurate Classification of Fall Directions.

Sokea Teng, Jung-Yeon Kim, Seob Jeon, Hyo-Wook Gil, Jiwon Lyu, Euy Hyun Chung, Kwang Seock Kim, Yunyoung Nam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sokea TengDepartment of ICT Convergence, Soonchunhyang University, Asan 31538, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0000-0478-9721
Jung-Yeon KimICT Convergence Research Center, Soonchunhyang University, Asan 31538, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7487-5748
Seob JeonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan 31151, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5230-1997
Hyo-Wook GilDepartment of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan 31151, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2550-2739
Jiwon LyuDivision of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan 31151, Republic of Korea.
Euy Hyun ChungDepartment of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan 31151, Republic of Korea.
Kwang Seock KimFuture Innovation Medical Research Center, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan 31151, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3329-1225
Yunyoung NamDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Soonchunhyang University, Asan 31538, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3318-9394

Funding

Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI)Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea HI21C1831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Falls represent a significant risk factor, necessitating accurate classification methods. This study aims to identify the optimal placement of wearable sensors-specifically accelerometers, gyroscopes, and magnetometers-for effective fall-direction classification. Although previous research identified optimal sensor locations for distinguishing falls from non-falls, limited attention has been given to the classification of fall direction across different body regions. This study assesses inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors placed at 12 distinct body locations to determine the most effective positions for capturing fall-related data. The research was conducted in three phases: first, comparing classifiers across all sensor locations to identify the most effective; second, evaluating performance differences between sensors placed on the left and right sides of the body; and third, exploring the efficacy of combining sensors from the upper and lower body regions. Statistical analyses of the results for the most effective classifier model demonstrate that the support vector machine (SVM) is more effective than other classifiers across all sensor locations, with statistically significant differences in performance. At the same time, the comparison between the left and right sensor locations shows no significant performance differences within the same anatomical areas. Regarding optimal sensor placement, the findings indicate that sensors positioned on the pelvis and upper legs in the lower body, as well as on the shoulder and head in the upper body, were the most effective results for accurate fall-direction classification. The study concludes that the optimal sensor configuration for fall-direction classification involves strategically combining sensors placed on the pelvis, upper legs, and lower legs.

Indexed as

AccelerometryAccidental FallsSupport Vector MachineWearable Electronic DevicesAdultFemaleHumansMaleMotionYoung Adultclassificationdaily life activityfall directionfallsfeature extractionIMU sensorsmachine learningoptimal sensorsensor location

Identifiers

PMID39409472
PMCPMC11479374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.