Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39409405›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Brain Function, Learning, and Role of Feedback in Complete Paralysis.

Stefano Silvoni, Chiara Occhigrossi, Marco Di Giorgi, Dorothée Lulé, Niels Birbaumer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stefano SilvoniInstitute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68159 Mannheim, Germany.
Chiara OcchigrossiALS Voice gGmbH, 72116 Mössingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0950-7399
Marco Di GiorgiALS Voice gGmbH, 72116 Mössingen, Germany.
Dorothée LuléDepartment of Neurology, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Niels BirbaumerInstitute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, Tübingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The determinants and driving forces of communication abilities in the locked-in state are poorly understood so far. Results from an experimental-clinical study on a completely paralyzed person involved in communication sessions after the implantation of a microelectrode array were retrospectively analyzed. The aim was to focus on the prerequisites and determinants for learning to control a brain-computer interface for communication in paralysis. A comparative examination of the communication results with the current literature was carried out in light of an ideomotor theory of thinking. We speculate that novel skill learning took place and that several aspects of the wording of sentences during the communication sessions reflect preserved cognitive and conscious processing. We also present some speculations on the operant learning procedure used for communication, which argues for the reformulation of the previously postulated hypothesis of the extinction of response planning and goal-directed ideas in the completely locked-in state. We highlight the importance of feedback and reinforcement in the thought-action-consequence associative chain necessary to maintain purposeful communication. Finally, we underline the necessity to consider the psychosocial context of patients and the duration of complete immobilization as determinants of the 'extinction of thinking' theory and to identify the actual barriers preventing communication in these patients.

Indexed as

BrainBrain-Computer InterfacesLearningCommunicationFeedbackHumansParalysiscognitioncommunicative barriercompletely locked-in stategoal-directed thinkingneurofeedbackoperant learningpsychosocial contextreinforcement

Identifiers

PMID39409405
PMCPMC11478792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.