Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39409399›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Motion Artifacts in Dynamic EEG Recordings: Experimental Observations, Electrical Modelling, and Design Considerations.

Alessandra Giangrande, Alberto Botter, Harri Piitulainen, Giacinto Luigi Cerone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Wrinkle-Adaptive Kirigami Wearables With Anisotropic Deformability for Sleep EEG Monitoring.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Full-Stack Architectures for Intelligent Brain-Computer Interfaces.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. EEG-Metabolic Coupling and Time Limit at V˙OJournal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alessandra GiangrandeLaboratory of Neuromuscular System and Rehabilitation Engineering, Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1311-1389
Alberto BotterLaboratory of Neuromuscular System and Rehabilitation Engineering, Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4797-0667
Harri PiitulainenFaculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, 40014 Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6866-6587
Giacinto Luigi CeroneLaboratory of Neuromuscular System and Rehabilitation Engineering, Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5295-5314

Funding

Academy of Finland 296240JYU Visiting Fellow Programme Grant 2023 1633/13.00.05.00/2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the progress in the development of innovative EEG acquisition systems, their use in dynamic applications is still limited by motion artifacts compromising the interpretation of the collected signals. Therefore, extensive research on the genesis of motion artifacts in EEG recordings is still needed to optimize existing technologies, shedding light on possible solutions to overcome the current limitations. We identified three potential sources of motion artifacts occurring at three different levels of a traditional biopotential acquisition chain: the skin-electrode interface, the connecting cables between the detection and the acquisition systems, and the electrode-amplifier system. The identified sources of motion artifacts were modelled starting from experimental observations carried out on EEG signals. Consequently, we designed customized EEG electrode systems aiming at experimentally disentangling the possible causes of motion artifacts. Both analytical and experimental observations indicated two main residual sites responsible for motion artifacts: the connecting cables between the electrodes and the amplifier and the sudden changes in electrode-skin impedance due to electrode movements. We concluded that further advancements in EEG technology should focus on the transduction stage of the biopotentials amplification chain, such as the electrode technology and its interfacing with the acquisition system.

Indexed as

ArtifactsElectrodesElectroencephalographyAmplifiers, ElectronicElectric ImpedanceEquipment DesignHumansMotionSignal Processing, Computer-Assistedbiomedical instrumentationEEG cap designEEG electrodeselectrode-amplifier system modellingelectroencephalographymotion artifactsthe brain

Identifiers

PMID39409399
PMCPMC11479364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.