Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39409372›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Robust Indoor Positioning with Smartphone by Utilizing Encoded Chirp Acoustic Signal.

Bingbing Cheng, Ying Huang, Chuanyi Zou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bingbing ChengState Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China.
Ying HuangSchool of Automobile and Information Engineering, Guangxi Eco-Engineering Vocational and Technical College, Liuzhou 545005, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0415-611X
Chuanyi ZouSchool of Geodesy and Geomatics, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, indoor positioning has been one of the hot topics in the field of navigation and positioning. Among different solutions on indoor positioning, positioning with acoustic signals has its promise due to its relatively high accuracy in the line of sight scenarios, low cost, and ease of being implemented in smartphones. In this work, a novel acoustic positioning method, called RATBILS, is proposed, in which encoded chirp acoustic signals are modulated and transmitted by different acoustic base stations. The smartphones receive the signals and perform the following three steps: (1) preprocessing; (2) time of arrival (TOA) estimation; and (3) time difference of arrival (TDOA) calculation and location estimation. In the preprocessing stage, we use band pass filters to filter out low-frequency noise from the environment. At the same time, we perform a signal decoding function in order to lock onto the positioning source. In the TOA estimation stage, we conduct both coarse and fine detection to enhance the accuracy and robustness of TOA estimation. The primary goal of coarse detection is to establish a noise range for fine detection. The main objective of fine detection is to emphasize the intensity of the first arrival diameter and resistance with multipath and non-line-of-sight (NLOS) caused by human body obstruction. In the TDOA calculation and location estimation stage, we estimate the TDOA based on the TOA estimation and then use the TDOA results for position estimation. In order to evaluate the performance of the proposed RATBILS system, two indoor field tests are carried out. The test results show that the RATBILS system achieves a positioning error of 0.23 m at 92% in region 1 of scene 1 and is superior to the traditional threshold method. The RATBILS system achieves a positioning error of 0.56 m at 92% in region 2 of scene 1 and is superior to the traditional threshold method. In scene 2, the maximum average positioning error was 1.26 m, which is better than the 3.33 m and 3.87 m of the two traditional threshold methods.

Indexed as

encoded chirp acoustic signalmultipath and NLOSsmartphoneTDOA

Identifiers

PMID39409372
PMCPMC11479093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.