Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39409289›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Radiation Detectors and Sensors in Medical Imaging.

Christos Michail, Panagiotis Liaparinos, Nektarios Kalyvas, Ioannis Kandarakis, George Fountos, Ioannis Valais

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The electronic structure of KJournal of materials chemistry. C · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christos MichailRadiation Physics, Materials Technology and Biomedical Imaging Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of West Attica, Ag. Spyridonos, 12210 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-5863-8013
Panagiotis LiaparinosRadiation Physics, Materials Technology and Biomedical Imaging Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of West Attica, Ag. Spyridonos, 12210 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-3036-9389
Nektarios KalyvasRadiation Physics, Materials Technology and Biomedical Imaging Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of West Attica, Ag. Spyridonos, 12210 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-9251-9170
Ioannis KandarakisRadiation Physics, Materials Technology and Biomedical Imaging Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of West Attica, Ag. Spyridonos, 12210 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-9383-1142
George FountosRadiation Physics, Materials Technology and Biomedical Imaging Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of West Attica, Ag. Spyridonos, 12210 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-8441-2656
Ioannis ValaisRadiation Physics, Materials Technology and Biomedical Imaging Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of West Attica, Ag. Spyridonos, 12210 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-6808-0252

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical imaging instrumentation design and construction is based on radiation sources and radiation detectors/sensors. This review focuses on the detectors and sensors of medical imaging systems. These systems are subdivided into various categories depending on their structure, the type of radiation they capture, how the radiation is measured, how the images are formed, and the medical goals they serve. Related to medical goals, detectors fall into two major areas: (i) anatomical imaging, which mainly concerns the techniques of diagnostic radiology, and (ii) functional-molecular imaging, which mainly concerns nuclear medicine. An important parameter in the evaluation of the detectors is the combination of the quality of the diagnostic result they offer and the burden of the patient with radiation dose. The latter has to be minimized; thus, the input signal (radiation photon flux) must be kept at low levels. For this reason, the detective quantum efficiency (DQE), expressing signal-to-noise ratio transfer through an imaging system, is of primary importance. In diagnostic radiology, image quality is better than in nuclear medicine; however, in most cases, the dose is higher. On the other hand, nuclear medicine focuses on the detection of functional findings and not on the accurate spatial determination of anatomical data. Detectors are integrated into projection or tomographic imaging systems and are based on the use of scintillators with optical sensors, photoconductors, or semiconductors. Analysis and modeling of such systems can be performed employing theoretical models developed in the framework of cascaded linear systems analysis (LCSA), as well as within the signal detection theory (SDT) and information theory.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingHumansNuclear MedicineSignal-To-Noise Ratioartificial intelligencedeep learningdiagnostic radiologymedical imaging systemsnuclear medicineoptical sensorsradiation detectors

Identifiers

PMID39409289
PMCPMC11478476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.