Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39409276›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Experimental Study of Long Short-Term Memory and Transformer Models for Fall Detection on Smartwatches.

Syed Tousiful Haque, Minakshi Debnath, Awatif Yasmin, Tarek Mahmud, Anne Hee Hiong Ngu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Syed Tousiful HaqueDepartment of Computer Science, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA.
Minakshi DebnathDepartment of Computer Science, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-2777-2437
Awatif YasminDepartment of Computer Science, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-0599-6568
Tarek MahmudDepartment of Computer Science, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1238-9397
Anne Hee Hiong NguDepartment of Computer Science, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation 2122374
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Falls are the second leading cause of unintentional injury deaths worldwide. While numerous wearable fall detection devices incorporating AI models have been developed, none of them are used successfully in a fall detection application running on commodity-based smartwatches in real time. The system misses some falls, and generates an annoying amount of False Positives for practical use. We have investigated and experimented with an LSTM model for fall detection on a smartwatch. Even though the LSTM model has high accuracy during offline testing, the good performance of offline LSTM models cannot be translated to the equivalence of real-time performance. Transformers, on the other hand, can learn long-sequence data and patterns intrinsic to the data due to their self-attention mechanism. This paper compares three variants of LSTM and two variants of Transformer models for learning fall patterns. We trained all models using fall and activity data from three datasets, and the real-time testing of the model was performed using the SmartFall App. Our findings showed that in the offline training, the CNN-LSTM model was better than the Transformer model for all the datasets. However, the Transformer is a preferable choice for deployment in real-time fall detection applications.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsAlgorithmsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerWearable Electronic Devicesdeep learningfall detectionLSTMtransformerswearables

Identifiers

PMID39409276
PMCPMC11478652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.