ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Comparative Analysis of the Codon Usage Pattern in the Chloroplast Genomes of Gnetales Species.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complete Chloroplast Genomes of FiveEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Article
- GGAR: gradient guided adaptive regularization enhances deep learning classification of brassica species using codon usage bias.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Comprehensive analysis of the complete chloroplast genome of white pomegranate and phylogenetic relationships within Myrtales.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Article
- Comprehensive analysis of chloroplast codon usage patterns in the important medicinal genusFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Comparative chloroplast genomics reveals codon usage bias, simple sequence repeat dynamics, and phylogenomic relationships in Urticaceae.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Article
- The Complete Chloroplast Genome ofGenes · 2025Article
- Plastome diversity and phylogenetic insights among modern Egyptian wheat cultivars: Genome-Wide and Gene-Level perspectives.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Codon Usage Bias of the Polyphenol Oxidase Genes inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of the Complete Chloroplast Genomes of EightCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Complete Chloroplast Genomes of 9International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Comparative chloroplast genomics of Cypripedioideae: structural divergence, adaptive evolution, and phylogenomic insights.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Comprehensive analysis of the codon usage patterns in the polyprotein coding sequences of the honeybee viruses.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Comparative chloroplast genomics of Rutaceae: structural divergence, adaptive evolution, and phylogenomic implications.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- The complete chloroplast genome sequence of the endangered species:Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Codon usage bias refers to the preferential use of synonymous codons, a widespread phenomenon found in bacteria, plants, and animals. Codon bias varies among species, families, and groups within kingdoms and between genes within an organism. Codon usage bias (CUB) analysis sheds light on the evolutionary dynamics of various species and optimizes targeted gene expression in heterologous host plants. As a significant order of gymnosperms, species within Gnetales possess extremely high ecological and pharmaceutical values. However, comprehensive analyses of CUB within the chloroplast genomes of Gnetales species remain unexplored. A systematic analysis was conducted to elucidate the codon usage patterns in 13 diverse Gnetales species based on the chloroplast genomes. Our results revealed that chloroplast coding sequences (cp CDSs) in 13 Gnetales species display a marked preference for AT bases and A/T-ending codons. A total of 20 predominantly high-frequency codons and between 2 and 7 optimal codons were identified across these species. The findings from the ENC-plot, PR2-plot, and neutrality analyses suggested that both mutation pressure and natural selection exert influence on the codon bias in these 13 Gnetales species, with natural selection emerging as the predominant influence. Correspondence analysis (COA) demonstrated variation in the codon usage patterns among the Gnetales species and indicated mutation pressure is another factor that could impact CUB. Additionally, our research identified a positive correlation between the measure of idiosyncratic codon usage level of conservatism (MILC) and synonymous codon usage order (SCUO) values, indicative of CUB's potential influence on gene expression. The comparative analysis concerning codon usage frequencies among the 13 Gnetales species and 4 model organisms revealed that
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.