Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39408696›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

Revolutionizing CAR T-Cell Therapies: Innovations in Genetic Engineering and Manufacturing to Enhance Efficacy and Accessibility.

Lorenzo Giorgioni, Alessandra Ambrosone, Maria Francesca Cometa, Anna Laura Salvati, Robert Nisticò, Armando Magrelli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Biologics for cardiovascular diseases: from bench to bedside.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Special Issue "State-of-the-Art Cancer Immunotherapies-2nd Edition".International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lorenzo GiorgioniFaculty of Physiology and Pharmacology "V. Erspamer", Sapienza Università di Roma, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0009-0000-2428-6726
Alessandra AmbrosoneNational Center for Drug Research and Evaluation, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0009-0001-5748-8989
Maria Francesca CometaNational Center for Drug Research and Evaluation, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Anna Laura SalvatiFaculty of Pharmacy, Tor Vergata University of Rome, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Robert NisticòFaculty of Pharmacy, Tor Vergata University of Rome, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3433-9232
Armando MagrelliNational Center for Drug Research and Evaluation, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5036-3710

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has achieved notable success in treating hematological cancers but faces significant challenges in solid-tumor treatment and overall efficacy. Key limitations include T-cell exhaustion, tumor relapse, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironments (TME), immunogenicity, and antigen heterogeneity. To address these issues, various genetic engineering strategies have been proposed. Approaches such as overexpression of transcription factors or metabolic armoring and dynamic CAR regulation are being explored to improve CAR T-cell function and safety. Other efforts to improve CAR T-cell efficacy in solid tumors include targeting novel antigens or developing alternative strategies to address antigen diversity. Despite the promising preclinical results of these solutions, challenges remain in translating CAR T-cell therapies to the clinic to enable economically viable access to these transformative medicines. The efficiency and scalability of autologous CAR T-cell therapy production are hindered by traditional, manual processes which are costly, time-consuming, and prone to variability and contamination. These high-cost, time-intensive processes have complex quality-control requirements. Recent advancements suggest that smaller, decentralized solutions such as microbioreactors and automated point-of-care systems could improve production efficiency, reduce costs, and shorten manufacturing timelines, especially when coupled with innovative manufacturing methods such as transposons and lipid nanoparticles. Future advancements may include harmonized consumables and AI-enabled technologies, which promise to streamline manufacturing, reduce costs, and enhance production quality.

Indexed as

Genetic EngineeringImmunotherapy, AdoptiveNeoplasmsReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAnimalsHumansT-LymphocytesTumor MicroenvironmentReceptors, Chimeric AntigenATMP manufacturingCAR Tgene editingGMP-in-a-boxhospital exemption

Identifiers

PMID39408696
PMCPMC11476879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.