Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39408541›Full record

ArticlePolymers2024

Efficacy of Acacia Gum Biopolymer in Strength Improvement of Silty and Clay Soils under Varying Curing Conditions.

Muralidaran Vishweshwaran, Evangelin Ramani Sujatha, Ateekh Ur Rehman, Arif Ali Baig Moghal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Muralidaran VishweshwaranCentre for Advanced Research in Environment, School of Civil Engineering, SASTRA Deemed University, Thanjavur 613401, India.
Evangelin Ramani SujathaCentre for Advanced Research in Environment, School of Civil Engineering, SASTRA Deemed University, Thanjavur 613401, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4138-2784
Ateekh Ur RehmanDepartment of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-2265-5828
Arif Ali Baig MoghalDepartment of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Warangal, Warangal 506004, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8623-7102

Funding

King Saud University RSPD2024R701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acacia gum (AG), a polysaccharide biopolymer, has been adopted to improve the strength of three cohesive soils by subjecting them to diverse environmental aging conditions. Being a polysaccharide and a potentially sustainable construction material, the AG yielded flexible film-like threads after 48 h upon hydration, and its pH value of 4.9 varied marginally with the aging of the stabilized soils. The soil samples for the geotechnical evaluation were subjected to wet mixing and were tested under their Optimum Moisture Content (OMC), as determined by the light compaction method. The addition of AG modified the consistency indices of the soils due to the presence of hydroxyl groups in AG, which also led to a rise in OMC and reduction in Maximum Dry Unit weight (MDU). The Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS) and California Bearing Ratio (CBR) were determined under thermal curing at 333 K as well as on the same day of sample preparation. The least performing condition of the soil's CBR was evaluated under submerged conditions after allowing the AG-stabilized specimens to air-cure for a period of 1 week. The UCS specimens tested after 7 days were subjected to the initial 7 days of thermal curing at 333 K. A dosage of 1.5% of AG yielded the UCS of 2530 kN/m

Indexed as

California bearing ratiogeotechnicalpolysaccharidessustainable construction materialsthermal curing

Identifiers

PMID39408541
PMCPMC11478573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.