ArticlePolymers2024
Enhanced Cellulose Extraction from Banana Pseudostem Waste: A Comparative Analysis Using Chemical Methods Assisted by Conventional and Focused Ultrasound.
Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Agri-Food Biowaste Bioactives for Biopesticides: A Circular Economy Solution with Industry 4.0?Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- A Data-Driven Semi-Quantitative Framework for Comparative Screening and Tiering of Cellulose Nanocrystal Isolation Pathways: Implications for Process Assessment and Future Optimization.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Obtention and Characterization of Bio-Based Composite PBAT/PLA Active Trays for Fresh Food Packaging.Polymers · 2026Article
- Ultrasound-Assisted Alkaline Hydrogen Peroxide Pretreatment for Biopolymer Recovery from Exhausted Purple Corn Cobs.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Conventional and Novel Strategies for Cellulose Isolation from Nut Shells: A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the effectiveness of various chemical methods, both ultrasound-assisted and non-assisted, for extracting cellulose from banana pseudostem (BPS) waste, comparing the results with commercial pine and eucalyptus cellulose fibers. Delignification treatments with NaOH (25% and 30%) and H
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.