ArticlePolymers2024
Impact of Shape Transformation of Programmable 3D Structures on UV Print Quality.
Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The field of 3D and 4D printing is advancing rapidly, offering new ways to control the transformation of programmable 3D structures in response to external stimuli. This study examines the impact of 3D printing parameters, namely the UV ink thickness (applied using a UV inkjet printer on pre-3D-printed programmable structures) and thermal activation, on the dimensional and surface changes to high-stress (HS) and low-stress (LS) programmable samples and on print quality. The results indicate that HS samples shrink in the longitudinal direction, while expanding in terms of their height and width, whereas LS samples exhibit minimal dimensional changes due to lower programmed stress. The dynamic mechanical analysis shows that UV ink, particularly cyan and CMYK overprints, reduces the shrinkage in HS samples by acting as a resistive layer. Thicker ink films further reduce the dimensional changes in HS samples. Thermal activation increases the surface roughness of HS structures, leading to the wrinkling of UV ink films, while LS structures are less affected. The surface gloss decreases significantly in HS structures after UV ink application; however, thermal activation has little impact on LS structures. UV ink adhesion remains strong across both HS and LS samples, suggesting that UV inks are ideal for printing on programmable 3D structures, where the colour print quality and precise control of the shape transformation are crucial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.